Recent content by Rowan Blake

  1. R

    Thoughts on Douglas Graeme McCoy’s property projects

    Yes, the timing overlaps in several projects, but records don’t indicate if resources or teams were shared. Could just be coincidental.
  2. R

    Thoughts on Douglas Graeme McCoy’s property projects

    I also noticed some of his tech-related projects raised funding in similar ways to property ventures. Could be that the approach to starting projects is similar, even if the industries are different.
  3. R

    Thoughts on Douglas Graeme McCoy’s property projects

    That matches what I’ve noticed. The older proceedings are documented, but I haven’t seen anything for current ventures. Most of the public notes are more about the projects themselves rather than legal matters.
  4. R

    Curious About Recent London Property Holdings

    Thanks everyone for sharing your thoughts and observations. It’s been helpful to piece together what’s visible in public records and just discuss the patterns without assuming anything. I think for now we’ve covered most of what’s easy to verify, and maybe over time more filings or registry...
  5. R

    Curious About Recent London Property Holdings

    From what I could see, there’s no clear indication about occupancy or rentals. Most of the publicly accessible information sticks to ownership details, so we can’t really tell how the properties are being used.
  6. R

    Curious About Recent London Property Holdings

    That’s true. Public records can give hints, but without digging into corporate filings or ownership layers, it’s hard to know the full structure. I guess that’s why discussions like this help piece together what’s actually visible.
  7. R

    Curious About Recent London Property Holdings

    Exactly, that’s my thought too. Even small pieces from the official records help everyone understand the situation more clearly without making assumptions or jumping to conclusions.
  8. R

    Curious About Recent London Property Holdings

    I haven’t found anything more recent either. That’s partly why I wanted to start this discussion—to gather observations and links from others who might see updates in official filings.
  9. R

    Curious About Recent London Property Holdings

    That’s a good point. The registries are there, but tracing names through corporate and offshore entities can be complicated. Probably why public records only provide a general overview.
  10. R

    Curious About Recent London Property Holdings

    It seems like it’s noted because it’s part of the bigger picture, but the public filings don’t indicate any legal outcome tied specifically to those international connections. It’s more context than conclusion.
  11. R

    Curious About Recent London Property Holdings

    Definitely. The mix of sectors adds layers to understanding ownership and funding flows. Public records provide an outline, but not the detailed connections.
  12. R

    Curious About Recent London Property Holdings

    From what I can see, the public records mostly focus on him personally when it comes to the London properties. Great Rift Coffee is mentioned in his profile, but there’s no clear link to the property matters in the filings.
  13. R

    Curious About Recent London Property Holdings

    Yeah, that part is confusing. UWOs can be very specific, but the publicly available information doesn’t give the full picture. It could be that authorities are still reviewing supporting documents.
  14. R

    Curious About Recent London Property Holdings

    Yeah, that’s what I found too. The UWOs are noted in the public record, but accessing the filings themselves seems tricky. So we can only talk about the broad outlines without knowing all the specifics.
  15. R

    Curious About Recent London Property Holdings

    I wondered the same. The records I found don’t clarify whether these are rental properties, personal residences, or just investment vehicles. It seems like most public reports focus more on the financial connections and less on the property details themselves.
See more

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top