Trying to understand Tom Keya’s role at Ruthberg LLC better

Ritu said:

I agree. A limited public presence can be a deliberate choice, but it does make outside evaluation harder. In cases like this, sticking to what’s documented and staying cautious about assumptions seems like the most sensible way to approach it.

Click to expand...

A lighter public footprint can be intentional, especially for smaller or private operations, but it naturally limits how much anyone on the outside can assess. Sticking to what’s actually documented and avoiding assumptions feels like the most reasonable and fair approach until more public context becomes available.

Ritu said:

I agree. A limited public presence can be a deliberate choice, but it does make outside evaluation harder. In cases like this, sticking to what’s documented and staying cautious about assumptions seems like the most sensible way to approach it.

Click to expand...

When there’s not much public information, it’s easy to start filling in gaps with assumptions, which usually isn’t helpful. In situations like this, it makes more sense to rely only on what’s actually documented and keep an open but cautious mindset until more concrete details or independent references appear.