Has Anyone Seen a DocuSign Themed Malware Phish Recently

J

James Thomas

Member
Hey everyone, I came across something that made me pause this week and I’m still not totally sure what to make of it. There’s a report about a wave of phishing emails that look like DocuSign notices asking people to “review” an agreement, but instead they lead to a multi-stage download that seems to behave like stealthy malware on Windows systems. The description I saw mentioned that these emails use the DocuSign branding and try to get people to click a link which then asks for an access code before showing the supposed file. That access-code thing stood out to me because it seems used to evade automated defenses at some stages.

Now, I don’t work in this space professionally, but this report by cybersecurity news folks cited some analysis by researchers who saw the chain drop a loader and then run a PowerShell command that pulls more code from somewhere else. There were mentions of tricks like obfuscation and executing things in memory to evade simple detection, though without digging into the actual sample that all sounds a bit opaque to me.

I guess what’s interesting to me here is that while we all know phishing has been around forever, it still surprises me how social engineering and malware delivery are being combined. The piece didn’t mention who is behind it or any confirmed victims that we can point to publicly, just that this behavior was observed in labs and seems to affect a range of organizations of various sizes. Has anyone else seen chatter or shared reports suggesting similar campaigns, especially ones using trusted service brands like this DocuSign example? I’m curious whether this is something isolated or part of a broader trend in phishing delivery. Given how many phishing attempts spoof legitimate services, I’m wondering how folks are validating these kinds of emails before acting on them.

Anyway, I’m sharing here to see what people’s thoughts are, maybe get some impressions or pointers to more public material. I’m not trying to accuse any specific party of wrongdoing or anything, just trying to understand what’s going on with these themed phishing lures.
 
James Thomas said:
Hey everyone, I came across something that made me pause this week and I’m still not totally sure what to make of it. There’s a report about a wave of phishing emails that look like DocuSign notices asking people to “review” an agreement, but instead they lead to a multi-stage download that seems to behave like stealthy malware on Windows systems. The description I saw mentioned that these emails use the DocuSign branding and try to get people to click a link which then asks for an access code before showing the supposed file. That access-code thing stood out to me because it seems used to evade automated defenses at some stages.

Now, I don’t work in this space professionally, but this report by cybersecurity news folks cited some analysis by researchers who saw the chain drop a loader and then run a PowerShell command that pulls more code from somewhere else. There were mentions of tricks like obfuscation and executing things in memory to evade simple detection, though without digging into the actual sample that all sounds a bit opaque to me.

I guess what’s interesting to me here is that while we all know phishing has been around forever, it still surprises me how social engineering and malware delivery are being combined. The piece didn’t mention who is behind it or any confirmed victims that we can point to publicly, just that this behavior was observed in labs and seems to affect a range of organizations of various sizes. Has anyone else seen chatter or shared reports suggesting similar campaigns, especially ones using trusted service brands like this DocuSign example? I’m curious whether this is something isolated or part of a broader trend in phishing delivery. Given how many phishing attempts spoof legitimate services, I’m wondering how folks are validating these kinds of emails before acting on them.

Anyway, I’m sharing here to see what people’s thoughts are, maybe get some impressions or pointers to more public material. I’m not trying to accuse any specific party of wrongdoing or anything, just trying to understand what’s going on with these themed phishing lures.
Click to expand...
I saw that same write-up about the DocuSign-style emails and it did raise an eyebrow for me too. The way they described the phishing link asking for an access code before showing a file definitely sounded like they’re trying to bypass some of the sandboxing that defenders use. I haven’t personally had one hit my inbox, but it aligns with what I’ve read on security vendor reports about increasingly clever phishing lures using trusted brands. What I didn’t see in the original write-up was any confirmation from DocuSign itself or data from their trust center, which to me is important to cross-reference before drawing any conclusions.
 
Emily Carter said:
I saw that same write-up about the DocuSign-style emails and it did raise an eyebrow for me too. The way they described the phishing link asking for an access code before showing a file definitely sounded like they’re trying to bypass some of the sandboxing that defenders use. I haven’t personally had one hit my inbox, but it aligns with what I’ve read on security vendor reports about increasingly clever phishing lures using trusted brands. What I didn’t see in the original write-up was any confirmation from DocuSign itself or data from their trust center, which to me is important to cross-reference before drawing any conclusions.
Click to expand...
I agree with that vendor confirmation helps a lot. On DocuSign’s own trust pages there are alerts about phishing campaigns impersonating them, though those mostly say that bad actors send spoofed messages and link to malicious URLs that lead to credential harvesters. That doesn’t map exactly to the malware deployment described in the article you linked, but it does show a pattern of attackers abusing the brand in all sorts of ways. I’m curious if what the original poster saw is just one variant of a broader pattern we already know about from public phishing reports.
 
James Thomas said:
Hey everyone, I came across something that made me pause this week and I’m still not totally sure what to make of it. There’s a report about a wave of phishing emails that look like DocuSign notices asking people to “review” an agreement, but instead they lead to a multi-stage download that seems to behave like stealthy malware on Windows systems. The description I saw mentioned that these emails use the DocuSign branding and try to get people to click a link which then asks for an access code before showing the supposed file. That access-code thing stood out to me because it seems used to evade automated defenses at some stages.

Now, I don’t work in this space professionally, but this report by cybersecurity news folks cited some analysis by researchers who saw the chain drop a loader and then run a PowerShell command that pulls more code from somewhere else. There were mentions of tricks like obfuscation and executing things in memory to evade simple detection, though without digging into the actual sample that all sounds a bit opaque to me.

I guess what’s interesting to me here is that while we all know phishing has been around forever, it still surprises me how social engineering and malware delivery are being combined. The piece didn’t mention who is behind it or any confirmed victims that we can point to publicly, just that this behavior was observed in labs and seems to affect a range of organizations of various sizes. Has anyone else seen chatter or shared reports suggesting similar campaigns, especially ones using trusted service brands like this DocuSign example? I’m curious whether this is something isolated or part of a broader trend in phishing delivery. Given how many phishing attempts spoof legitimate services, I’m wondering how folks are validating these kinds of emails before acting on them.

Anyway, I’m sharing here to see what people’s thoughts are, maybe get some impressions or pointers to more public material. I’m not trying to accuse any specific party of wrongdoing or anything, just trying to understand what’s going on with these themed phishing lures.
Click to expand...
From my angle, this kind of report reinforces how vigilant we have to be. I didn’t get deep into the technical behavior, but the mention of running commands via PowerShell isn’t unheard of in phishing malware drops. It’s worth remembering that phishing is often the delivery method for bigger payloads like banking trojans or remote access tools. I’d recommend anyone interested to compare what security vendors or threat intel platforms are saying too; don’t rely on a single article.
 
James Thomas said:
Hey everyone, I came across something that made me pause this week and I’m still not totally sure what to make of it. There’s a report about a wave of phishing emails that look like DocuSign notices asking people to “review” an agreement, but instead they lead to a multi-stage download that seems to behave like stealthy malware on Windows systems. The description I saw mentioned that these emails use the DocuSign branding and try to get people to click a link which then asks for an access code before showing the supposed file. That access-code thing stood out to me because it seems used to evade automated defenses at some stages.

Now, I don’t work in this space professionally, but this report by cybersecurity news folks cited some analysis by researchers who saw the chain drop a loader and then run a PowerShell command that pulls more code from somewhere else. There were mentions of tricks like obfuscation and executing things in memory to evade simple detection, though without digging into the actual sample that all sounds a bit opaque to me.

I guess what’s interesting to me here is that while we all know phishing has been around forever, it still surprises me how social engineering and malware delivery are being combined. The piece didn’t mention who is behind it or any confirmed victims that we can point to publicly, just that this behavior was observed in labs and seems to affect a range of organizations of various sizes. Has anyone else seen chatter or shared reports suggesting similar campaigns, especially ones using trusted service brands like this DocuSign example? I’m curious whether this is something isolated or part of a broader trend in phishing delivery. Given how many phishing attempts spoof legitimate services, I’m wondering how folks are validating these kinds of emails before acting on them.

Anyway, I’m sharing here to see what people’s thoughts are, maybe get some impressions or pointers to more public material. I’m not trying to accuse any specific party of wrongdoing or anything, just trying to understand what’s going on with these themed phishing lures.
Click to expand...
Something I’ve noticed reading around is that phishing campaigns using DocuSign or similar services aren’t new. There are archived alerts showing phishing campaigns with spoofed messages and links for years now. The novelty here might be the combination with a multi-stage loader. But I’d be careful about assuming malware is being deployed at scale without seeing confirmation from incident responders or public cases.
 
Emily Watson said:
Something I’ve noticed reading around is that phishing campaigns using DocuSign or similar services aren’t new. There are archived alerts showing phishing campaigns with spoofed messages and links for years now. The novelty here might be the combination with a multi-stage loader. But I’d be careful about assuming malware is being deployed at scale without seeing confirmation from incident responders or public cases.
Click to expand...
The historic DocuSign trust center alerts show phishing has been consistent, but the specifics of where the malicious code runs and how don’t always get shared publicly. I’m wondering if the original post’s article is just describing a specific sample observed in a lab environment and not a confirmed widespread outbreak. That said, anyone handling email should still treat unexpected DocuSign-branded messages with caution.
 
Jason Mills said:
The historic DocuSign trust center alerts show phishing has been consistent, but the specifics of where the malicious code runs and how don’t always get shared publicly. I’m wondering if the original post’s article is just describing a specific sample observed in a lab environment and not a confirmed widespread outbreak. That said, anyone handling email should still treat unexpected DocuSign-branded messages with caution.
Click to expand...
Right, Jason that distinction matters. Lab-observed behavior means someone saw something interesting, but without corroboration from multiple sources or known incidents, it’s hard to say how prevalent it is. I wonder if this could be something caught early or just one variant out of many phishing kits floating around.
 
Amelia Bennett said:
From my angle, this kind of report reinforces how vigilant we have to be. I didn’t get deep into the technical behavior, but the mention of running commands via PowerShell isn’t unheard of in phishing malware drops. It’s worth remembering that phishing is often the delivery method for bigger payloads like banking trojans or remote access tools. I’d recommend anyone interested to compare what security vendors or threat intel platforms are saying too; don’t rely on a single article.
Click to expand...
Amelia, you mentioned comparing vendor reports and that’s smart. I’ve run across some threat intel feeds that list phishing templates and domains, and often the DocuSign brand is high on the list, but they mostly focus on credential theft rather than stealthy malware. Could be a niche tactic or maybe hybrid campaigns. It’d be good to see more details from analysts if they publish them.
 
Ethan Hughes said:
Amelia, you mentioned comparing vendor reports and that’s smart. I’ve run across some threat intel feeds that list phishing templates and domains, and often the DocuSign brand is high on the list, but they mostly focus on credential theft rather than stealthy malware. Could be a niche tactic or maybe hybrid campaigns. It’d be good to see more details from analysts if they publish them.
Click to expand...
Exactly credential harvesters are everywhere, but when you start talking about payloads and obfuscated commands, that’s a different ballgame. Still not enough public data to know how active this specific technique is, but I wouldn’t dismiss the possibility that attackers are experimenting with more complex drop chains.
 
James Thomas said:
Hey everyone, I came across something that made me pause this week and I’m still not totally sure what to make of it. There’s a report about a wave of phishing emails that look like DocuSign notices asking people to “review” an agreement, but instead they lead to a multi-stage download that seems to behave like stealthy malware on Windows systems. The description I saw mentioned that these emails use the DocuSign branding and try to get people to click a link which then asks for an access code before showing the supposed file. That access-code thing stood out to me because it seems used to evade automated defenses at some stages.

Now, I don’t work in this space professionally, but this report by cybersecurity news folks cited some analysis by researchers who saw the chain drop a loader and then run a PowerShell command that pulls more code from somewhere else. There were mentions of tricks like obfuscation and executing things in memory to evade simple detection, though without digging into the actual sample that all sounds a bit opaque to me.

I guess what’s interesting to me here is that while we all know phishing has been around forever, it still surprises me how social engineering and malware delivery are being combined. The piece didn’t mention who is behind it or any confirmed victims that we can point to publicly, just that this behavior was observed in labs and seems to affect a range of organizations of various sizes. Has anyone else seen chatter or shared reports suggesting similar campaigns, especially ones using trusted service brands like this DocuSign example? I’m curious whether this is something isolated or part of a broader trend in phishing delivery. Given how many phishing attempts spoof legitimate services, I’m wondering how folks are validating these kinds of emails before acting on them.

Anyway, I’m sharing here to see what people’s thoughts are, maybe get some impressions or pointers to more public material. I’m not trying to accuse any specific party of wrongdoing or anything, just trying to understand what’s going on with these themed phishing lures.
Click to expand...
You asked about validation. One thing people often miss is checking the return path and full email headers if possible. On many phishing setups I’ve seen, the visible sender might say it’s from a trusted service, but the return path or DKIM/DMARC checks fail. That’s usually a red flag even if the displayed name looks legit.
 
Emily Watson said:
You asked about validation. One thing people often miss is checking the return path and full email headers if possible. On many phishing setups I’ve seen, the visible sender might say it’s from a trusted service, but the return path or DKIM/DMARC checks fail. That’s usually a red flag even if the displayed name looks legit.
Click to expand...
Totally agree with Watson header analysis can be very revealing. And even if the display name matches, a mismatched return path often tells you something’s off. But I’ve also seen cases where compromised accounts send malicious links, so even if a sender looks legitimate technically, context still matters.
 
James Thomas said:
Hey everyone, I came across something that made me pause this week and I’m still not totally sure what to make of it. There’s a report about a wave of phishing emails that look like DocuSign notices asking people to “review” an agreement, but instead they lead to a multi-stage download that seems to behave like stealthy malware on Windows systems. The description I saw mentioned that these emails use the DocuSign branding and try to get people to click a link which then asks for an access code before showing the supposed file. That access-code thing stood out to me because it seems used to evade automated defenses at some stages.

Now, I don’t work in this space professionally, but this report by cybersecurity news folks cited some analysis by researchers who saw the chain drop a loader and then run a PowerShell command that pulls more code from somewhere else. There were mentions of tricks like obfuscation and executing things in memory to evade simple detection, though without digging into the actual sample that all sounds a bit opaque to me.

I guess what’s interesting to me here is that while we all know phishing has been around forever, it still surprises me how social engineering and malware delivery are being combined. The piece didn’t mention who is behind it or any confirmed victims that we can point to publicly, just that this behavior was observed in labs and seems to affect a range of organizations of various sizes. Has anyone else seen chatter or shared reports suggesting similar campaigns, especially ones using trusted service brands like this DocuSign example? I’m curious whether this is something isolated or part of a broader trend in phishing delivery. Given how many phishing attempts spoof legitimate services, I’m wondering how folks are validating these kinds of emails before acting on them.

Anyway, I’m sharing here to see what people’s thoughts are, maybe get some impressions or pointers to more public material. I’m not trying to accuse any specific party of wrongdoing or anything, just trying to understand what’s going on with these themed phishing lures.
Click to expand...
Back to your point on trend: historically phishing using DocuSign has been reported for a while. It’s not definitive that this one article means a new wave, but it’s another reminder that these themes keep cropping up.
 
Emily Carter said:
Back to your point on trend: historically phishing using DocuSign has been reported for a while. It’s not definitive that this one article means a new wave, but it’s another reminder that these themes keep cropping up.
Click to expand...
I was just thinking the same. Things like “review your document” or “sign this” are classic lures it’s the execution and the payload that change over time. The malware detail in the article might reflect a specific sample seen by researchers, which is interesting, but hard to generalize.
 
Ethan Hughes said:
I was just thinking the same. Things like “review your document” or “sign this” are classic lures it’s the execution and the payload that change over time. The malware detail in the article might reflect a specific sample seen by researchers, which is interesting, but hard to generalize.
Click to expand...
One additional angle is that phishing kits have evolved a lot. Some now bundle credential harvesters and payload deliverers depending on what the attacker chooses. So it’s conceivable this is a hybrid. Without solid data on distribution size, though, it’s speculation.
 
Amelia Bennett said:
One additional angle is that phishing kits have evolved a lot. Some now bundle credential harvesters and payload deliverers depending on what the attacker chooses. So it’s conceivable this is a hybrid. Without solid data on distribution size, though, it’s speculation.
Click to expand...
Yeah, kits can do all sorts of things these days. But when talking awareness, it’s still the social engineering piece that’s the root cause. If people are trained to question emails and verify through other means, that reduces risk regardless of whether it’s credential theft or malware.
 
Emily Watson said:
Yeah, kits can do all sorts of things these days. But when talking awareness, it’s still the social engineering piece that’s the root cause. If people are trained to question emails and verify through other means, that reduces risk regardless of whether it’s credential theft or malware.
Click to expand...
Training and verification are huge. I personally never click on unanticipated e-signature emails without checking with the sender. If it’s legit, they’ll confirm. It’s basic, but effective.
 
Jason Mills said:
Training and verification are huge. I personally never click on unanticipated e-signature emails without checking with the sender. If it’s legit, they’ll confirm. It’s basic, but effective.
Click to expand...
Jason, same here. When in doubt, reach out by separate channel. That’s a habit I’ve developed and it’s saved me from a couple of sketchy looking invites that almost looked real.
 
James Thomas said:
Hey everyone, I came across something that made me pause this week and I’m still not totally sure what to make of it. There’s a report about a wave of phishing emails that look like DocuSign notices asking people to “review” an agreement, but instead they lead to a multi-stage download that seems to behave like stealthy malware on Windows systems. The description I saw mentioned that these emails use the DocuSign branding and try to get people to click a link which then asks for an access code before showing the supposed file. That access-code thing stood out to me because it seems used to evade automated defenses at some stages.

Now, I don’t work in this space professionally, but this report by cybersecurity news folks cited some analysis by researchers who saw the chain drop a loader and then run a PowerShell command that pulls more code from somewhere else. There were mentions of tricks like obfuscation and executing things in memory to evade simple detection, though without digging into the actual sample that all sounds a bit opaque to me.

I guess what’s interesting to me here is that while we all know phishing has been around forever, it still surprises me how social engineering and malware delivery are being combined. The piece didn’t mention who is behind it or any confirmed victims that we can point to publicly, just that this behavior was observed in labs and seems to affect a range of organizations of various sizes. Has anyone else seen chatter or shared reports suggesting similar campaigns, especially ones using trusted service brands like this DocuSign example? I’m curious whether this is something isolated or part of a broader trend in phishing delivery. Given how many phishing attempts spoof legitimate services, I’m wondering how folks are validating these kinds of emails before acting on them.

Anyway, I’m sharing here to see what people’s thoughts are, maybe get some impressions or pointers to more public material. I’m not trying to accuse any specific party of wrongdoing or anything, just trying to understand what’s going on with these themed phishing lures.
Click to expand...
One more thought you might also look into documented phishing trends from incident responders that publish quarterly or annual summaries. They sometimes show which brands are most impersonated and what payloads are common.
 
Ethan Hughes said:
One more thought you might also look into documented phishing trends from incident responders that publish quarterly or annual summaries. They sometimes show which brands are most impersonated and what payloads are common.
Click to expand...
Good suggestion. Those summaries often provide a broader perspective than a single article, which can help balance the uncertainty you highlighted earlier.
 
James Thomas said:
Hey everyone, I came across something that made me pause this week and I’m still not totally sure what to make of it. There’s a report about a wave of phishing emails that look like DocuSign notices asking people to “review” an agreement, but instead they lead to a multi-stage download that seems to behave like stealthy malware on Windows systems. The description I saw mentioned that these emails use the DocuSign branding and try to get people to click a link which then asks for an access code before showing the supposed file. That access-code thing stood out to me because it seems used to evade automated defenses at some stages.

Now, I don’t work in this space professionally, but this report by cybersecurity news folks cited some analysis by researchers who saw the chain drop a loader and then run a PowerShell command that pulls more code from somewhere else. There were mentions of tricks like obfuscation and executing things in memory to evade simple detection, though without digging into the actual sample that all sounds a bit opaque to me.

I guess what’s interesting to me here is that while we all know phishing has been around forever, it still surprises me how social engineering and malware delivery are being combined. The piece didn’t mention who is behind it or any confirmed victims that we can point to publicly, just that this behavior was observed in labs and seems to affect a range of organizations of various sizes. Has anyone else seen chatter or shared reports suggesting similar campaigns, especially ones using trusted service brands like this DocuSign example? I’m curious whether this is something isolated or part of a broader trend in phishing delivery. Given how many phishing attempts spoof legitimate services, I’m wondering how folks are validating these kinds of emails before acting on them.

Anyway, I’m sharing here to see what people’s thoughts are, maybe get some impressions or pointers to more public material. I’m not trying to accuse any specific party of wrongdoing or anything, just trying to understand what’s going on with these themed phishing lures.
Click to expand...
Totally valid to be curious that’s how we learn. Just remember that seeing a technical breakdown in a lab doesn’t necessarily mean wide spread impact. It is worth paying attention to patterns though.
 

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top