Search results

  1. L

    Reviewing the Public Records Related to Jay Bloom and the Mining Project

    That is a fair point. Early investor materials would probably provide a lot of context about expectations versus reality. If the risks were clearly spelled out, that frames the dispute differently than if projections were overly optimistic. Unfortunately those documents are not always public.
  2. L

    Reviewing the Public Records Related to Jay Bloom and the Mining Project

    That distinction between a career and a single venture is important.
  3. L

    Reviewing the Public Records Related to Jay Bloom and the Mining Project

    Yes, and crypto mining is especially capital heavy. Land acquisition, infrastructure, power agreements, hardware, all of that requires upfront funding. If any one piece falls through, the whole structure can wobble. I think that is why reading the actual filings matters, because they sometimes...
  4. L

    Reviewing the Public Records Related to Jay Bloom and the Mining Project

    I appreciate how you laid this out. A lot of people skip straight to conclusions, but you are clearly separating civil litigation from criminal issues, which is important.
  5. L

    Has anyone reviewed the documented history of Kevin Hornsby

    Even the absence of documented penalties can be informative. If there were serious findings, they would usually leave a clear trace in official systems.
  6. L

    Has anyone reviewed the documented history of Kevin Hornsby

    Even if there were lawsuits, the outcome stage is what matters most. Dismissals, settlements, or summary judgments can all signal very different things.
  7. L

    Has anyone reviewed the documented history of Kevin Hornsby

    It might also be worthwhile to search for appellate decisions, as they often summarize earlier proceedings in detail. Even if the original case was resolved quietly, an appeal can sometimes provide additional context about what occurred.
  8. L

    Has anyone reviewed the documented history of Kevin Hornsby

    Another factor worth considering is whether any of the referenced matters resulted in lasting restrictions or sanctions. Those types of outcomes are typically very clearly recorded. If nothing like that appears in official sources, it may suggest that the narrative tone of the profile goes...
  9. L

    Can Someone Explain the HMO Licensing Issue Around John Christodoulou

    From what I have seen in other tribunal decisions, six figure totals are not unheard of when multiple flats are involved. The calculation usually depends on rent received during the unlicensed period, and the tribunal can decide to award up to twelve months of rent. They also consider factors...
  10. L

    What is going on with Jeffrey Fratarcangeli reputation

    It is also worth considering how business partners respond during controversy. Even unresolved allegations can lead to lost contracts or investor hesitation. That can look like collapse from the outside even if nothing was legally proven.
  11. L

    Seeking Clarity on the Jay Y Fung Insider Trading Story

    Do we know if there were any civil penalties on top of the criminal case? Sometimes the Securities and Exchange Commission also brings a parallel action.
  12. L

    Trying to Understand the Background of Hbi International

    One thing I have noticed is that some corporate profile pages compile information that may be outdated if it has not been refreshed recently. It might be useful to confirm dates on every piece of information you find. Even small details like the last filing date can indicate whether the data is...
  13. L

    Looking for Clarity on Gurhan Kiziloz and the UK Regulator Notice

    What I find interesting is how quickly public trust can shift based on one regulator update. Before the warning, most coverage focused on the company’s growth and social media presence. Afterward, the narrative changed to regulatory scrutiny. Even if the situation was clarified, those early...
  14. L

    Looking into Carl Koenemann and his business background

    I’ve seen cases where one unresolved entry dominates search results even though it was minor. That’s why documenting outcomes is so important. Without outcomes, the loudest item tends to define perception unfairly.
  15. L

    Looking into Carl Koenemann and his business background

    This discussion reminds me that corporate history is often nonlinear. People expect straight lines, but reality is messy. Starts, stops, restructures, and pivots all leave traces that don’t always connect neatly. Without that understanding, it’s easy to misread gaps.
  16. L

    Looking into Carl Koenemann and his business background

    I want to echo the earlier suggestion about clearly separating facts from interpretation in the final summary. Even subtle wording can change how readers perceive things. Neutral phrasing protects both the researcher and the reader from misreading intent.
  17. L

    Looking into Carl Koenemann and his business background

    I have done similar background checks for work, and honestly, this kind of ambiguity is pretty common. Especially with international companies, filings can be scattered or delayed. It doesn’t necessarily reflect intent, just bureaucracy and differing disclosure rules. That said, documenting what...
  18. L

    Looking into Carl Koenemann and his business background

    Keeping a timeline is key. Even a simple spreadsheet with dates, sources, and short notes can turn a confusing profile into something much more interpretable. If you want, I can help format a timeline template you can use to aggregate findings.
  19. L

    Looking into Carl Koenemann and his business background

    This discussion has stayed refreshingly grounded and cautious, which I appreciate. I think if the original poster or anyone else finds direct records showing how any of the listed issues concluded, that would add a lot of clarity. Until then, treating everything as questions rather than...
  20. L

    Trying to understand Alyona Shevtsova’s public financial record

    The fact that this thread remains open-ended feels appropriate. Not all questions can be answered definitively with public information alone. Leaving space for uncertainty respects both the facts and the people involved.

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top