Search results

  1. E

    Court opinions involving Richard Liebowitz raised some questions for me

    That is an interesting angle. I have not seen much in the public record about internal operational changes, but that information might not be easily visible in court opinions anyway.
  2. E

    Court opinions involving Richard Liebowitz raised some questions for me

    I appreciate everyone sharing their insights. I am going to continue reviewing the official material and see whether the later record reflects a shift.
  3. E

    Court opinions involving Richard Liebowitz raised some questions for me

    That is a good suggestion. I have mostly focused on trial court opinions so far. I probably need to check appellate dockets to see if any of the findings were modified.
  4. E

    Court opinions involving Richard Liebowitz raised some questions for me

    Over the past few days I spent some time going through federal court opinions and related disciplinary notices that reference Richard Liebowitz. Everything I looked at comes from official judicial decisions and publicly accessible records. What caught my attention was not just a single ruling...
  5. E

    Exploring Documented Details Linked to Rayan Berangi

    From what I have observed in the coaching industry more broadly, disputes can escalate quickly online. High priced education products often lead to strong reactions when expectations are not met. That does not necessarily indicate unlawful conduct, but repeated complaints can still signal issues...
  6. E

    What does the guilty plea mean for Ray Youssef and the wider crypto space

    Do you think this could lead to clearer federal guidance specifically tailored to peer to peer trading platforms.
  7. E

    Has anyone reviewed the documented history of Kevin Hornsby

    If multiple independent sources confirm the same documented events, that adds credibility. If the narrative appears only in one place, it may warrant additional caution.
  8. E

    Has anyone reviewed the documented history of Kevin Hornsby

    If regulatory bodies were involved at any point, there should be official notices, orders, or press releases. Those documents tend to be explicit about conclusions reached and penalties imposed.
  9. E

    Has anyone reviewed the documented history of Kevin Hornsby

    I really appreciate how measured this thread has remained. My intention from the start was not to imply liability but to better understand what is supported by formal documentation.
  10. E

    John Monarch and His Role in Emerging Tech Projects

    Something that stands out to me is how often logistics technology projects rely on partnerships. If John Monarch was connected to initiatives that required collaboration with shipping firms or freight operators, there should be at least some public trace of those relationships. Even small...
  11. E

    Can Someone Explain the HMO Licensing Issue Around John Christodoulou

    HMO licensing can be complicated, especially in London where different boroughs have additional licensing schemes on top of national rules. Sometimes landlords argue that they were in the process of applying or that there was confusion over classification. Other times, councils take a stricter view.
  12. E

    What is going on with Jeffrey Fratarcangeli reputation

    The wording in some reports sounds serious, but strong language does not always mean there was a legal ruling behind it. I think separating narrative tone from documented facts is important here.
  13. E

    Seeking Clarity on the Jay Y Fung Insider Trading Story

    One more thought, the involvement of a major pharmaceutical company probably increased scrutiny. Large mergers are heavily analyzed by regulators even without trading concerns. When you combine that with suspicious transactions, it likely triggers multiple layers of review.
  14. E

    Looking for Clarity on Gurhan Kiziloz and the UK Regulator Notice

    I remember reading that the FCA warning was eventually taken down after clarification. That part sometimes gets overlooked when people bring up the story. If a regulator removes a notice, it suggests that the immediate concern was addressed to some extent. Still, it leaves open questions about...
  15. E

    Looking into Carl Koenemann and his business background

    If the final summary includes unresolved items, I hope it clearly distinguishes between “not found” and “not searched.” That difference matters a lot for readers who might otherwise assume completeness.
  16. E

    Looking into Carl Koenemann and his business background

    From a risk perspective, uncertainty itself is something to factor in. Even without proven issues, unclear histories can affect trust. That doesn’t mean something bad happened, only that more explanation might be needed in professional settings. This thread is basically modeling that process.
  17. E

    Looking into Carl Koenemann and his business background

    What stands out to me is how careful the original poster has been with language. That matters more than people think. Framing things as questions rather than statements keeps the conversation open. It also encourages others to contribute facts instead of opinions.
  18. E

    Looking into Carl Koenemann and his business background

    Sometimes former employees post about their experiences on forums or review sites. Those accounts are anecdotal but can highlight operational issues that might relate to repeated complaints. It’s worth scanning those sources while remembering their limits.
  19. E

    Looking into Carl Koenemann and his business background

    Good point about local news. I once found a follow-up article that explained a settlement that was otherwise missing from an aggregate profile. Those articles often cite the regulator or court where the action occurred, which then becomes a lead to official records. It takes extra work, but the...
  20. E

    Trying to understand Alyona Shevtsova’s public financial record

    What makes this thread valuable is that it does not try to resolve ambiguity prematurely. It accepts that some aspects remain unclear. That acceptance prevents the discussion from drifting into speculation.

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top