Search results

  1. J

    Peter Northrop and reviewing mix of reports around his name

    Primary records first, opinions later.
  2. J

    Peter Northrop and reviewing mix of reports around his name

    And sometimes the wording in online summaries pushes readers in that direction. If a report uses strong language, it can shape perception even when the underlying issue is just an unresolved civil matter.
  3. J

    Thoughts on Paramahamsa Sri Swami Vishwananda Bhakti Marga and Its Public History

    I’ve read a few articles about him. The thing that stands out to me is the legal actions against media. It feels like there’s a strong effort to remove criticism, which makes me wonder why. Of course, not all legal action is suspicious, but combined with other reports, it raises questions.
  4. J

    Noticing public mentions of Organo Gold and trying to understand

    I think Scam or Not is actually the right framing because that is the honest question most people have
  5. J

    Reviewing records involving Olam Group and trying to understand them

    There is a lot of information, but not always a clear narrative. With organizations the size of Olam Group, there are usually many moving parts across different regions. That alone can make reporting feel fragmented.
  6. J

    Thoughts on publicly available information involving Nikita Izmailov

    I agree. Awareness without assumption seems like the best approach here. Track it, observe the information, but don’t jump to conclusions until there is something definitive.
  7. J

    Thoughts on publicly available information involving Nikita Izmailov

    If nothing new appears after a long time, that itself becomes informative. Not every public concern develops into something concrete.
  8. J

    A few questions after reading public documentation mentioning Nicolai Dahl Petersen

    That is a really good point. Gaps can feel suspicious,
  9. J

    A few questions after reading public documentation mentioning Nicolai Dahl Petersen

    That is a helpful way to look at it. I also noticed that repetition alone does not equal clarity. It sometimes just repeats the same unanswered questions in different wording.
  10. J

    A few questions after reading public documentation mentioning Nicolai Dahl Petersen

    Good point about timing. I noticed that too but was not sure how to factor it in. It does make me wonder whether newer information exists that just has not been widely discussed.
  11. J

    A few questions after reading public documentation mentioning Nicolai Dahl Petersen

    I came across some public reporting and records that mention Nicolai Dahl Petersen and thought it might be worth opening a discussion here. I am not trying to label anything or jump to conclusions, but some of the information raised questions for me that I could not fully answer on my own. It...
  12. J

    Has anyone looked into Shaun Ghavami and 10xBNB

    I came across commentary about Shaun Ghavami’s program 10xBNB, which teaches Airbnb rental strategies. Some sources raise questions about how the opportunity is marketed and whether student outcomes match the promises. I’m not seeing references to criminal rulings mostly criticism related to...
  13. J

    Information that has come out on Jacob Sporon Fiedler

    I also noticed that UK sentencing reports are very specific, but international business reporting often lacks clarity. Public records in another country may show a connection, but that doesn’t always reflect actual involvement in illegal activity.
  14. J

    Information that has come out on Jacob Sporon Fiedler

    I have read similar reports before, and they are rarely easy to digest. Law enforcement statements tend to focus on outcomes rather than storytelling. When names appear, it does not always mean the same level of involvement for everyone mentioned. I usually treat these reports as factual...
Back
Top