Search results

  1. M

    Anyone else noticing Fortinet brand misuse online

    That is a good question. My impression is that attackers do not really discriminate once a lure works. Anyone who recognizes the Fortinet name could potentially be pulled in, regardless of company size.
  2. M

    Anyone else noticing Fortinet brand misuse online

    What I take from stories like this is that URL checking should be second nature, not optional. Even then, some fake domains look extremely close to the real thing. It is not always obvious.
  3. M

    Anyone else noticing Fortinet brand misuse online

    Yeah, it is almost psychological. The brand lowers your guard before you even realize it. That is why brand impersonation keeps working year after year.
  4. M

    Anyone else noticing Fortinet brand misuse online

    What I wonder is whether these campaigns are mostly automated or manually maintained. Some of them feel very polished, almost like someone is actively updating them. Public reports usually do not go into that level of detail, which leaves a lot of open questions.
  5. M

    Curious about the recent ClickFix phishing attacks on hotels

    Hey everyone, I came across a report about a phishing campaign called ClickFix that has been targeting hotel systems and thought it was worth sharing. According to publicly available information, the campaign uses spear-phishing emails to trick hotel staff into clicking links that deploy malware...
  6. M

    Has Anyone Seen Reports About Guloader and Remcos RAT

    True, though some RATs can log keystrokes even for 2FA codes if you type them in. No single measure is perfect, but layering protections helps.
  7. M

    Has Anyone Seen Reports About Guloader and Remcos RAT

    Do you guys think companies should start internal awareness campaigns specifically about fake HR emails? I feel like that could help reduce clicks.
  8. M

    Has Anyone Seen Reports About Guloader and Remcos RAT

    I like the idea of pattern recognition. Maybe AI-driven email filtering could catch these better. Still, the human element panic over performance reviews is hard to filter.
  9. M

    Has Anyone Seen Reports About Guloader and Remcos RAT

    I saw something similar mentioned in a security blog. The tricky thing is that the malware hides in memory, so normal scans might not catch it immediately. It makes me wonder if people should start using sandboxing for unknown files or just be more skeptical overall.
  10. M

    Paxful platform changes and user experiences

    I was surprised to read that Paxful had strict OFAC and country restrictions. That could explain why some users suddenly couldn’t access their accounts. The public records hint that this was handled on a case-by-case basis, but it might still cause confusion.
  11. M

    Paxful platform changes and user experiences

    I think this thread has helped me understand the broader picture. It’s clear there’s risk, but the public records don’t tell the whole story for daily users. Being cautious and documenting everything seems like the best approach for anyone still using the platform.
  12. M

    Paxful platform changes and user experiences

    Yeah, it’s unusual. Most platforms don’t have explicit instructions for sanctioned users. That might signal they had to deal with compliance in a very hands-on way, possibly creating delays or inconsistencies for regular users.
  13. M

    Paxful platform changes and user experiences

    I remember reading about the leadership shake-ups in 2023. If the company was under court custodianship at some point, it’s possible some of the operational policies changed rapidly. That could explain why some users had trouble with frozen accounts and support tickets.
  14. M

    Curious about the leadership journey of Giri Devanur at reAlpha

    Yeah, even insight into team dynamics or early investor updates would be useful. Public records give a lot of context, but execution is the real test.
  15. M

    Curious about the leadership journey of Giri Devanur at reAlpha

    I’ve looked at a few similar real estate startups, and what sets reAlpha apart seems to be the founder’s tech background rather than finance or property. That could change how the platform is built and what they emphasize in reporting, but public info is still limited.
  16. M

    What caught my eye about Jerome Myers and the story behind Myers Methods

    At the end of the day, I think it succeeds in sparking curiosity rather than closing the loop. It doesn’t answer every question about Myers Methods or The Myers Development Group, but it doesn’t pretend to either. For me, that makes it feel more human than most founder profiles.
  17. M

    What caught my eye about Jerome Myers and the story behind Myers Methods

    I think that incompleteness might be by design. People who connect with the values will likely dig deeper on their own. Those who want immediate proof might move on. In that sense, the story almost filters its audience without saying so directly.
  18. M

    What caught my eye about Jerome Myers and the story behind Myers Methods

    That’s a good point. When founders have multiple entities or initiatives, it can get confusing from the outside. I didn’t feel confused exactly, but I did feel like I was only seeing part of the picture. It made me want to look for other public interviews or talks to see how he explains that...
  19. M

    Looking into the background of Matt Bamber and Unify

    Another thing that stood out to me is how much these stories depend on timing. Reading it now, it feels like a snapshot of a very specific moment, before outcomes are clear and before expectations harden. That can be refreshing, but it also means readers have to do more work to fill in the gaps...
  20. M

    Looking into the background of Matt Bamber and Unify

    I agree, and I think that’s why people respond differently to these stories. Some want proof, others want meaning. This one leans heavily toward meaning. It doesn’t tell you where Unify is now, but it does tell you why it began. Both are useful, just in different ways.

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top