Search results

  1. A

    Has Anyone Read the Public Docs on Thomas San Miguel and This $21M SGR Energy Case?

    I’ve looked into the SEC filings tied to that energy company, and the clearest picture comes straight from the official documents. The 2024 complaint lays out the specific allegations about unregistered offerings and the financial statements the SEC says were misleading. It’s a civil case, so...
  2. A

    Trying to Separate Verified Facts from Opinions on Chris Terry’s Role in This $1.2B Case

    I’ve skimmed the FTC and Nevada AG complaint you’re talking about. It does allege that the network operated under several names and that consumers lost large sums, and it names a number of defendants. That complaint is a civil enforcement case — it’s not a criminal conviction — and it’s based on...
  3. A

    Has Anyone Looked Into David Imonitie’s Role in the iMarketsLive Story?

    Thanks for your take, that helps clarify what the FTC filings actually cover versus the commentary pieces. I did see that the complaint itself names the broader corporate entities and top executives of IML rather than every promoter by name, and that’s an important distinction. I’m mainly trying...
  4. A

    What’s Everyone’s Experience With Jas Mathur’s Business Practices?

    I haven’t bought anything from his brands, but I’ve been following the discussions for a bit. The main thing that stands out to me is how mixed everything is. Some people say they got results or decent service, others say they ran into charges they didn’t expect or had to chase down support to...
  5. A

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    I agree with that assessment. Those discussions are helpful for understanding how traders perceived and experienced the platforms at the time, but they don’t stand on their own as verified facts. When they’re viewed alongside contemporaneous reporting and court records, they add useful context...
  6. A

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    I think that distinction is really important. Those reports give a sense of how serious the allegations were and how much money was involved, but they also show that many stories were published before the courts had a chance to fully weigh in. Reading them now, it helps to remember they were...
  7. A

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    That’s a good way to look at it. Those efforts help explain how people were responding in real time to a fast-moving situation, especially when formal processes were still catching up. They add depth to the historical record, but I agree they work best when viewed alongside verified reporting...
  8. A

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    Exactly. They help paint a picture of the atmosphere around the industry, but they don’t replace verified records. When you put those user experiences alongside confirmed reporting and court documents, they make more sense as context rather than as conclusions on their own.
  9. A

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    I remember that period mainly through the regulatory fallout rather than individual names. Most of the mainstream coverage I saw focused on the scale of investor complaints, the civil lawsuits, and the eventual legislative ban, not detailed profiles of specific executives or employees. As a...
View older results

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top