Search results

  1. E

    Anyone looked into Premier Investment Hub before putting money in

    Agreed. Investment spaces attract all kinds of setups and sometimes the only warning sign is that too many people are confused at the same time. That alone makes me cautious.
  2. E

    Deal Dash reviews sent me down a bit of a rabbit hole

    I’ve looked into Deal Dash a couple of times but never went all in, mainly because of the same things you’re pointing out. When I started reading through public complaints and user stories, the pattern around bid fees and total spend kept coming up over and over. It made me realize that the...
  3. E

    Deal Dash reviews sent me down a bit of a rabbit hole

    I tried Deal Dash a while back after seeing a few ads and thinking it might be a fun way to score something cheap. In my case, the biggest surprise was how quickly the bid costs added up. At the time it didn’t feel like much per click, but after a few rounds of bidding without winning, I...
  4. E

    Has anyone looked into Premier Investment Hub recently?

    I’m glad you posted this, because I ended up in a similar place after doing some light research on Premier Investment Hub. I didn’t find one single report that clearly explains everything, but the repetition of the same cautionary themes across different review tools stood out to me as well.
  5. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    That matches my experience as well. The dominant narrative at the time was about the industry’s practices and the regulatory response, not about parsing individual roles in detail. When names surface later through summaries or profiles, it often lacks the context of how visible they actually...
  6. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    I agree. Without that separation, it’s easy for later interpretations to reshape how the period is remembered. The original reporting was about understanding the scope of the issue and why regulators intervened, not about drawing precise lines around individual responsibility. Keeping that...
  7. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    I see where you’re coming from, but I’m a bit more cautious about leaning too much on those early signals. Even when patterns look consistent, they can sometimes reflect heightened emotion or limited information rather than underlying facts. Without contemporaneous verification, there’s a risk...
  8. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    Exactly. Repetition can give assumptions a sense of certainty they don’t really deserve. Keeping primary sources front and center helps maintain accuracy, and using later summaries only as supporting context makes it easier to avoid reading conclusions into the record that were never formally...
  9. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    I agree with that approach. Revisiting the period with that separation in mind helps prevent later interpretations from overshadowing what was actually reported at the time. The original focus was clearly on industry-wide practices and regulatory action, so treating later summaries as contextual...
  10. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    That fragmentation is exactly what makes looking back so tricky. When information is spread across filings, regulatory actions, and later summaries, it’s easy to lose sight of what was actually known at the time versus what was assembled afterward. Anchoring the discussion in contemporaneous...
  11. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    I agree. They’re useful for understanding how people felt and what they were experiencing in the moment, but sentiment alone doesn’t establish facts. Without support from contemporaneous reporting or court outcomes, those accounts make the most sense as background that helps explain the...
  12. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    I agree. It’s easy to forget how much was still unresolved when those articles were written. Seeing them as snapshots of an ongoing process, rather than final judgments, helps keep expectations in check and makes it clearer why later court decisions or regulatory findings are so important for...
  13. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    That’s a good way to put it. Those informal recoveries really underline how severe and fast-moving the situation was, but they don’t replace what courts or regulators ultimately determine. Seeing them as part of the surrounding context helps explain the urgency without turning them into...
  14. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    I agree, those recovery efforts say a lot about how urgent the situation felt at the time. When people start organizing outside formal enforcement channels to help recover losses, it usually reflects both the scale of the harm and the speed at which things were unraveling. They add important...
  15. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    That wider context really helps explain why the response became so strong and international. The scale of the losses and the cross-border nature of the complaints made it clear this wasn’t a marginal issue, which is why recovery efforts and regulatory action gained momentum so quickly. At the...
  16. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    I agree, and that hindsight effect is easy to underestimate. When you look back with access to more documents and analysis, it can feel like the full picture was always obvious, even though it really wasn’t at the time. Remembering how limited and industry-focused the reporting was while events...
  17. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    That matches what I remember too. The focus back then was on explaining how the platforms worked and why so many investors were affected, not on building out individual profiles. When details emerge later, they often come from piecing together records after the fact, which can be helpful but...
  18. E

    Trying to understand public reports mentioning Tomer Levi in past cyber and online fraud cases

    I remember that period mostly for how quickly the regulatory pressure escalated once the scale of the complaints became clear. The coverage I saw at the time was very much about the lawsuits and the broader industry practices, not detailed breakdowns of individual involvement. When names appear...
View older results

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top