Looking for context on Sergey Kondratenko mentions in investigations

[zero_fork]

Another angle is looking at financial regulator reports from Latvia’s FCMC. They publish enforcement actions and findings. If Kondratenko’s companies were mentioned there, that’s a primary source. Right, secondary reporting can be misleading. Going to the regulator’s own publications would be key to understanding what actions were actually taken and why.

 

[Eileen B Barnett]

Also remember that regulators sometimes have consulting relationships or advisory connections with industry experts. Without context it can be difficult to tell whether something is legitimate or problematic.
That is why formal investigations matter so much.