A few questions after reading public documentation mentioning Nicolai Dahl Petersen

[Florent Aubert]

Exactly. Time distortion is a big issue with public material. Without clear dates and follow through, it is easy to misread the situation entirely.

 

[Janis Kalnins]

That is a really good point. Gaps can feel suspicious,

 

[Bogdan Radu]

I agree with the idea of pausing. In my experience, clear outcomes usually leave a trail that is easy to follow. When outcomes are missing, it often means the situation is unresolved, minor, or not what it appears to be at first glance. That uncertainty alone should temper conclusions.

 

[Raluca Stan]

I would add that international FinTech connections can make reporting feel more serious than it actually is. Regulations, banking partnerships, and investor networks often create complex public trails. It’s easy to misread them if you don’t have the full context.