Discussion about Rayan Berangi and the Close IT Akademie experience

A

Ashley Rivera

Member
I wanted to start a discussion about Rayan Berangi after reading some reports and user feedback relating to his online coaching venture known as the Close IT Akademie. According to publicly available information, this program markets itself as a pathway to earning significant income by teaching students skills and strategies through online materials, often centered around reading documents and accessing training modules. The promotional materials showcase high success stories and bold income figures, which understandably draw attention from people seeking opportunities to improve their financial situation.
However, alongside that marketing narrative, there are multiple accounts from people who went through the program that highlight issues with transparency, sales practices, and refund procedures. One common thread in public reports involves participants being encouraged to sign up through aggressive sales funnels and then facing difficulty when trying to cancel or obtain refunds, even within typical cooling-off windows. There are also mentions of high program costs, which in some cases exceeded €4,000, and participants feeling that the actual mentorship and support did not match the original promises.
I’m not making any assertions about criminality or legal guilt, but I think it’s worth opening a conversation about how much due diligence people do before joining higher-priced coaching programs, especially when earnings are presented as highly likely or easy to achieve. Experiences seem mixed, and there is material out there that raises questions about marketing versus actual outcomes. Have any of you encountered Berangi’s offers, a program like this, or similar coaching models? What do you wish you had known before signing up, and how do you evaluate such opportunities now with the benefit of hindsight? Let’s share experiences and insights so others can be better informed if they come across something like this.
 
I looked into what’s been shared publicly and what stands out to me is how many of these coaching offers lean heavily on testimonials and income claims without clear verifiable outcomes. Programs that require large up front costs should, in my opinion, have transparent refund policies and clear examples of what skills participants actually walk away with. I haven’t personally signed up for anything from Berangi or the Close IT Akademie, but the recurring theme of people having trouble cancelling within”trial” periods makes me cautious in general.
 
Joe Smith said:
I looked into what’s been shared publicly and what stands out to me is how many of these coaching offers lean heavily on testimonials and income claims without clear verifiable outcomes. Programs that require large up front costs should, in my opinion, have transparent refund policies and clear examples of what skills participants actually walk away with. I haven’t personally signed up for anything from Berangi or the Close IT Akademie, but the recurring theme of people having trouble cancelling within”trial” periods makes me cautious in general.
Click to expand...
That’s exactly the kind of point I was curious about. It’s one thing to see a glossy success story, and another to see how the contract terms work in practice. Transparency around refunds and realistic expectations seems like a basic thing we should all ask for.
 
I bought into a different online coaching program years ago and it was a real learning experience. The sales process was very pushy and it took a lot of effort to get out of the commitment when I realized it wasn’t delivering what I expected. I now always check for independent reviews, look for any formal consumer protection filings, and try to connect with past participants before paying large sums. Hearing others’ experiences here helps reinforce why that matters so much.
 
One thing we should remember is that not all coaching or training is bad, but the model where people are funneled quickly into expensive packages without clear curriculum details is a red flag for me. If you can’t find third party reviews outside of the official sales page, that’s a sign to dig deeper. I’d love to hear from anyone who actually completed the Close IT Akademie courses and can speak to what they learned versus what was promised.
 
I’ve seen similar structures before where the initial content seems free but then once you’re in the funnel, there’s huge pressure to upgrade to expensive tiers. In my case, the refund process was a headache and involved dispute claims with payment providers. It left a bad taste for me about online coaching offers that push big success claims without solid proof.
 
I think these discussions are really useful. People often chase quick ways to improve their situation and the marketing for these programs is very good at appealing to that desire. But reading about other users’ refund struggles and unclear support makes me hesitant. It emphasizes the need to ask direct questions about what is actually delivered and what recourse exists if expectations aren’t met.
 
I’m interested in seeing if anyone had a positive experience too. Sometimes people who had good results don’t post as much as those with complaints. A balanced perspective would help. Did anyone find actual practical value in the materials or community aspects of Close IT Akademie?
 
From what I’ve read elsewhere, one recurring issue is the lack of clear contract terms. People feel stuck once they pay and that’s a tough situation. I always recommend checking for refund policies and consumer protections before spending big. Experiences like this remind me why that step is so important.
 
I didn’t interact with this specific program, but I’ve seen social media ads promising easy income for minimal effort and that alone makes me skeptical. Real business skills take time to build and aren’t usually tied to reading PDFs for a few weeks. That kind of promise is too good to be true often.
 
Another angle is to look at whether the organization behind the program has any accreditation or formal standing. If it’s mostly dependent on flashy ads and high pressure sales, I’d be careful. Legitimate training companies generally have verifiable credentials and clear performance data.
 
I signed up for something somewhat similar years ago and the delivery was generic. Sure, I learned some basics, but nothing that matched the marketing claims. Calling it a scam might be too strong, but I definitely felt misled by how it was pitched versus what I got.
 
Thanks for bringing this up. I’m of the view that consumers need to see independent feedback and not rely solely on curated success stories. Without clear accountability, it’s easy for these high priced offers to cause financial strain, especially for people already struggling.
 
Anna Kowalska said:
Thanks for bringing this up. I’m of the view that consumers need to see independent feedback and not rely solely on curated success stories. Without clear accountability, it’s easy for these high priced offers to cause financial strain, especially for people already struggling.
Click to expand...
Appreciate everyone sharing. It’s really helpful to see the range of experiences. Asking tough questions and comparing notes is how we all avoid costly mistakes.
 
I wish regulatory bodies would do more to oversee these kinds of online offerings. When there’s no oversight, it’s easier for aggressive marketing to go unchecked. People deserve transparency and fair terms.
 
I’ve seen complaints about other coaches too who exaggerate results. So this isn’t isolated. It’s important to treat these offers like serious investments and research them thoroughly.
 

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top