Discussion on Different Accounts of Damian Prosalendis Activities

When I read the critical article, I was struck more by the tone than the substance. Strong language can sometimes signal personal frustration rather than objective analysis. I would feel more confident forming an opinion if there were court documents, regulatory notices, or formal investigations referenced.
 
Has anyone checked whether his companies have official registration numbers listed on their websites or in public filings. That is often a basic transparency measure. If those numbers exist, they can be cross referenced with government databases. It is a straightforward way to confirm at least the existence of a legal entity. It does not speak to performance, but it helps establish a foundation.
 
Has anyone checked whether his companies have official registration numbers listed on their websites or in public filings. That is often a basic transparency measure. If those numbers exist, they can be cross referenced with government databases. It is a straightforward way to confirm at least the existence of a legal entity. It does not speak to performance, but it helps establish a foundation.
I did not see registration numbers prominently displayed, but I might have missed them. I will revisit the sites with that specifically in mind.
 
One more thought is to examine whether there have been any consumer complaints filed with official agencies. In some countries, those are publicly searchable. If there are none, that might suggest limited controversy at a regulatory level.
 
I am also curious about whether there are archived interviews in established business magazines or newspapers. Even smaller regional outlets would count as third party coverage. Those typically involve at least some editorial oversight. If such pieces exist, they might clarify aspects of his professional background. If not, that absence is still informative.
 
Back
Top