Has Anyone Really Experienced The Human Reach Coaching Program?

glassfern

glassfern

Member
Hey everyone, I recently stumbled across some discussions about A.J. Mizes and his company, Human Reach. From what I can gather, Mizes, who used to work in HR at Facebook, started this career coaching service called Career AMP. I was initially interested because of the glowing ads and promises, but when I started digging into public records and online chatter, things got a little murky.

A few Reddit threads highlighted some odd patterns in the reviews and testimonials for Human Reach. Several accounts, which seemed brand-new or had little activity, were posting extremely positive stories about Career AMP, sometimes almost word-for-word across different threads. Some users even traced one of these accounts back to an employee at Human Reach, which raised questions about authenticity.

On Trustpilot, the picture is also mixed. While the company has a few positive mentions, most of the reviews are critical, describing high prices, underwhelming coaching, and general disappointment. A handful of positive reviews appear oddly timed and isolated, making me wonder if they were posted strategically.

I’m curious if anyone else has experience or insights on Human Reach or Career AMP. It seems like there’s a lot of information out there, but separating genuine feedback from potentially promotional content is tricky. Has anyone actually gone through their programs or noticed similar review patterns?
 
I looked into them a while back. The reviews always seemed too scripted to me. Makes you wonder how many were actually from real clients.
 
Yeah I noticed the same thing. Some accounts were basically ghost profiles with only one glowing review. Definitely raises eyebrows.
 
: I actually spent a few weeks going through their Career AMP materials. Honestly, some of the exercises are okay if you’re completely new to career planning, but nothing revolutionary. The hype definitely oversells it compared to what you actually get.
 
One thing that bothered me was the pressure to leave feedback immediately after sessions. Felt like they were trying to lock in positive reviews before you had time to think critically about the experience.
 
I saw some reports that even people who left critical reviews were later contacted by HR reps trying to “clarify” their experience. Not threatening or anything, just felt pushy and made people second-guess posting negative comments.
 
Yeah, and the timing of the reviews is weird. There are months where dozens of positive ones pop up almost at once, then long stretches of nothing. Feels orchestrated.
 
I went down a deep rabbit hole reading multiple threads about Human Reach and A.J. Mizes. One thing that stood out is how much overlap there is between accounts posting reviews and accounts interacting with posts. Some of the same usernames pop up praising the program across different platforms, almost like a coordinated effort. It really made me question whether the positive feedback was organic or seeded by employees or affiliates.
 
I actually tried signing up for a short trial just to see what the program was like firsthand. The content itself wasn’t bad, but there was this constant push to “share your success story” and post reviews. It felt more like they were grooming content for marketing rather than genuinely helping clients.
 
Something else I noticed is how they handle negative feedback. A lot of users reported receiving follow-up messages that tried to “clarify” their critique or subtly encourage them to change their review. It wasn’t aggressive, but it definitely felt like review management rather than genuine engagement.
 
One pattern I noticed in Reddit discussions is that some glowing reviews appear from brand-new accounts with almost no other activity. That’s usually a red flag in my experience. And the timing is suspicious too – multiple positive reviews appearing almost at the same time.
 
I spoke to someone who actually completed a full Career AMP course. They said the coaching was decent and gave some actionable advice, but nothing unique that you couldn’t find in free webinars or guides. So even if the program delivers some value, it’s hard to justify the cost when you compare it to other options.
 
And the pricing is another thing that makes people pause. For what amounts to a few video sessions and some templates, it seems quite high. People are naturally looking for something that justifies the expense, and mixed or possibly curated reviews don’t help.
 
What’s really concerning to me is the lack of transparency around who posts reviews. If employees or affiliates are incentivized to post glowing feedback, that can be misleading to anyone genuinely trying to assess the program. Even subtle bias like this matters when people are investing money and time.
 
I just wonder if they’re aware that this kind of thing damages long-term trust. Even if the program has some value, people notice when feedback seems manipulated.
 
For anyone considering Career AMP, I’d suggest trying to talk to former clients directly if possible. It’s the only way to get a realistic idea without relying on potentially curated testimonials.
 
duskturn said:
For anyone considering Career AMP, I’d suggest trying to talk to former clients directly if possible. It’s the only way to get a realistic idea without relying on potentially curated testimonials.
Click to expand...
Absolutely. That’s my takeaway too. Online chatter paints part of the picture, but firsthand accounts from real users are gold in situations like this.
 
I also looked at some LinkedIn profiles connected to the reviewers. Some accounts have almost zero personal history outside praising Career AMP or interacting with Human Reach posts. That makes me skeptical that the reviews are fully authentic.
 
I think threads like this are really helpful because they pull together observations from multiple sources. You start seeing a pattern where it’s not just isolated complaints or praise, but a mix that suggests some manipulation of perception online.
 

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top