Exactly my thinking. Even if some people here have had okay experiences so far, why would anyone gamble with their money when the regulatory score is literally zero? that's not some confusing situation where you can argue both sides. that's pretty clear. zero means none. nothing. not a single regulator watching what they do. And honestly everything we've been talking about makes so much more sense now. The random withdrawal delays, the extra document requests that come out of nowhere, the inconsistent support responses, the weird leverage offers all of it clicks into place when you realize there's no regulator holding them accountable, they can literally do whatever they want because who's going to stop them? if they feel like slowing down withdrawals, they just do it. If they want to ask for the same documents ten times, nothing stops them. If they decide one day that you can't have your money at all, what's your next step? you can't complain to anyone because no one has authority over them. That's the part that scares me most honestly. not the delays themselves but the complete lack of any backup plan if things go really wrong. with a regulated broker, if they mess up you have somewhere to go. you can file complaints, there are people who can help, there might even be protection funds that cover some of your losses. with this? you're just hoping they feel like being fair. and hoping is not a strategy i want to use with my savings. so yeah, zero regulation score means zero interest from me. plenty of other options out there that won't leave me completely exposed.