I Have Questions About Mike Dreher’s Network Structure

[nomad42x]

I wouldn’t call it a solid business opportunity based on what I’ve seen.

 

[ironleaf]

A lot of former participants lose money while only a few at the top seem to benefit. That dynamic is troubling.

 

[lunarbind]

The complaints about lack of refund clarity are also troubling.

 

[velaSun]

When people talk about being pressured to keep buying in or go into debt, that’s a major issue. In a legitimate business opportunity, sales are transparent, and people can make informed choices. Here, many accounts describe regretting their financial commitments after discovering the reality did not match the promotional pitch. That’s why so many voices call this a high-risk venture rather than a standard business model.

 

[brickwave]

Even social media restrictions hint at something deeper.

 

[slowindex]

Even social media restrictions hint at something deeper.

Thanks that helps clarify why so many members in different countries raise red flags rather than praise.

 

[brickwave]

The fact critics describe it as predatory feels important.

 

[deltaHatch]

Whether or not you consider it a scam, the risks described here are real for many participants. Lack of transparency, heavy costs, and unclear earnings make it hard to view this as a straightforward opportunity. Anyone considering this should seek detailed official info first before spending significant money.