Is Brad Chandler coaching worth the price and experience

I came across a public dossier about Brad Chandler that summarizes a range of feedback and information about his coaching and real estate related activities that people have shared online. What caught my eye was the mix of experiences some clients and reviewers have talked about regarding his $5,500 coaching program and how it’s been discussed in public reviews and comment sections. Nothing in what I found amounts to a legal finding one way or the other, but there are various concerns being discussed in different places.

According to open reports and user comments compiled on that public page, there are repeated mentions of people feeling disappointed with the value they received from the coaching and some talk about marketing efforts that didn’t match their expectations. A few reviewers describe issues with customer service and the overall usefulness of the materials they bought into, and some mention regulatory attention to certain mailings from his companies.

I’m not here to take a position, but I wanted to bring this up because there seems to be a mix of talk out there and very few comprehensive discussions in one place. If anyone has come across public reviews, forum threads, or open records that help paint a clearer picture of Brad Chandler’s coaching reputation, share what you’ve seen so we can all better understand the range of experiences others have had.
 
I also think timing matters. A program that worked for someone years ago may not feel relevant now, especially in changing markets. When reading older and newer public feedback side by side, you can sometimes see that evolution. In the case of Brad Chandler, the later comments seem more cautious and reflective, at least from what I’ve read.
 
I also think timing matters. A program that worked for someone years ago may not feel relevant now, especially in changing markets. When reading older and newer public feedback side by side, you can sometimes see that evolution. In the case of Brad Chandler, the later comments seem more cautious and reflective, at least from what I’ve read.
That’s a really good observation. Context gets lost when people only read one review. Seeing how sentiment shifts over time gives a more realistic picture.
 
I have seen his ads floating around for years. The pricing always made me hesitate, especially since real estate coaching quality can vary a lot. Curious what people who actually paid think in hindsight.
 
In my experience with similar programs, the value really depends on how much direct access you get. Pre recorded material alone rarely justifies that kind of price. That is just my general observation though.
 
In my experience with similar programs, the value really depends on how much direct access you get. Pre recorded material alone rarely justifies that kind of price. That is just my general observation though.
That makes sense. A lot of the comments I saw seemed to revolve around access versus content, which is probably where expectations and reality clash.
 
I read some long forum threads a while back where people broke down what they received week by week. Some found it helpful for mindset, others felt it was mostly stuff you could find elsewhere with enough digging.
 
One thing I always look for is how refund requests are handled. Public comments about support responsiveness tell you a lot about how a program is run day to day.
 
One thing I always look for is how refund requests are handled. Public comments about support responsiveness tell you a lot about how a program is run day to day.
Yeah support came up more than once in what I read. It did not sound consistent across users, which is interesting.
 
I have not bought his coaching, but I did attend a free session years ago. It was very high energy and sales focused. That does not mean the paid side is bad, but it did shape my expectations.
 
Real estate coaching has always been a mixed bag. Some people need structure and motivation more than new information, and those people sometimes feel satisfied even if the content is basic.
 
Real estate coaching has always been a mixed bag. Some people need structure and motivation more than new information, and those people sometimes feel satisfied even if the content is basic.
That is a good point. Value can be very subjective depending on what someone is missing when they sign up.
 
I spent a few weeks digging through longer write ups and older forum discussions about Brad Chandler coaching, and what stood out to me was how inconsistent the experiences sounded. Some people clearly felt energized and pushed into taking action, while others felt the structure was too generic for the price. That kind of split usually tells me the program is more about accountability and motivation than deep technical guidance, which can work for some personalities and totally miss for others.
 
I spent a few weeks digging through longer write ups and older forum discussions about Brad Chandler coaching, and what stood out to me was how inconsistent the experiences sounded. Some people clearly felt energized and pushed into taking action, while others felt the structure was too generic for the price. That kind of split usually tells me the program is more about accountability and motivation than deep technical guidance, which can work for some personalities and totally miss for others.
That lines up closely with what I noticed as well. The feedback rarely says nothing was provided, but more that what was provided did not always match what people thought they were signing up for.
 
I have not enrolled myself, but a colleague of mine did a similar high priced real estate coaching program and had mixed feelings. He said the biggest benefit was the network and feeling like he was not alone anymore. At the same time, he admitted most of the tactics were things he could have learned slowly on his own. That makes me think Brad Chandler program might appeal more to people early in their journey.
 
I have not enrolled myself, but a colleague of mine did a similar high priced real estate coaching program and had mixed feelings. He said the biggest benefit was the network and feeling like he was not alone anymore. At the same time, he admitted most of the tactics were things he could have learned slowly on his own. That makes me think Brad Chandler program might appeal more to people early in their journey.
That is an interesting angle. The networking and momentum aspect does not always come across clearly in written reviews, but it probably plays a big role in how people judge value.
 
When it comes to pricing like this, I think transparency is everything. If people know upfront that the program focuses on mindset, accountability, and general frameworks, they can decide if that is worth it to them. Problems usually start when marketing language suggests highly personalized or advanced strategies and the delivery feels more broad.
 
I noticed some public comments referencing regulatory questions around certain mail campaigns, but it was hard to find clear details. That does not automatically mean wrongdoing, but it does raise questions about how aggressively the business was promoted at different points. I wish more discussions focused on verified public records instead of speculation.
 
I noticed some public comments referencing regulatory questions around certain mail campaigns, but it was hard to find clear details. That does not automatically mean wrongdoing, but it does raise questions about how aggressively the business was promoted at different points. I wish more discussions focused on verified public records instead of speculation.
Same here. I tried to separate confirmed information from opinion, but it takes effort since everything is scattered across different discussions.
 
From my perspective, real estate coaching as an industry struggles with credibility overall. There are good mentors out there, but the barrier to entry is low, and marketing often outpaces substance. Brad Chandler seems to sit somewhere in the middle based on public feedback, not universally praised, not universally criticized either.
 
I think one overlooked factor is timing. Someone joining during a market upswing might feel the coaching helped because deals were easier, while someone joining during tougher conditions might feel let down. Public reviews rarely account for that context, but it heavily influences perception.
 
Back
Top