Is Brad Chandler coaching worth the price and experience

I came across a public dossier about Brad Chandler that summarizes a range of feedback and information about his coaching and real estate related activities that people have shared online. What caught my eye was the mix of experiences some clients and reviewers have talked about regarding his $5,500 coaching program and how it’s been discussed in public reviews and comment sections. Nothing in what I found amounts to a legal finding one way or the other, but there are various concerns being discussed in different places.

According to open reports and user comments compiled on that public page, there are repeated mentions of people feeling disappointed with the value they received from the coaching and some talk about marketing efforts that didn’t match their expectations. A few reviewers describe issues with customer service and the overall usefulness of the materials they bought into, and some mention regulatory attention to certain mailings from his companies.

I’m not here to take a position, but I wanted to bring this up because there seems to be a mix of talk out there and very few comprehensive discussions in one place. If anyone has come across public reviews, forum threads, or open records that help paint a clearer picture of Brad Chandler’s coaching reputation, share what you’ve seen so we can all better understand the range of experiences others have had.
 
Click to expand...
What I appreciate about threads like this is that they slow things down. Instead of shouting scam or genius, they let people compare notes calmly. For anyone considering spending that much, reading a wide range of public experiences like these is probably the smartest first step.
 
ironleaf said:
What I appreciate about threads like this is that they slow things down. Instead of shouting scam or genius, they let people compare notes calmly. For anyone considering spending that much, reading a wide range of public experiences like these is probably the smartest first step.
Click to expand...
Exactly my thinking. I am not trying to label anything here, just trying to understand what patterns actually show up when you look at the feedback as a whole.
 
I went pretty deep into older discussions and archived comments about Brad Chandler coaching, and what struck me most was how expectations seemed to shape the entire experience. People who joined expecting step by step real estate tactics often sounded disappointed, while those who framed it as mindset training plus accountability seemed more neutral or even positive. That gap alone explains why reviews look so polarized when you read them side by side.
 
Something I noticed in longer reviews is that many people talked about the emotional high at the beginning. The onboarding, calls, and community hype appeared to create momentum early on. Where frustration crept in was a few months later when people realized progress still depended heavily on their own execution and local market conditions.
 
I have not joined his program, but I have joined another high ticket coaching offer in a different industry. Reading Brad Chandler feedback felt very familiar. The pattern of strong marketing, high expectations, and mixed follow through shows up again and again. That does not automatically mean the program is bad, but it does mean buyers need to be very clear about what problem they are actually trying to solve.
 
One aspect that deserves more attention is how long people stayed in the program. Some public comments came from people who left early, others from those who stuck around for a year or more. Naturally their perspectives were very different. Short term users often focused on cost shock, while long term users talked more about gradual mindset shifts.
 
What made me cautious was not just the price, but how some reviews described communication after enrollment. When people feel ignored or brushed off, even solid material can lose its perceived value. Support quality is a huge part of any coaching experience, especially when money involved is significant.
 
I noticed that a few public discussions mentioned that the program content felt broad rather than tailored. For beginners, broad frameworks can be helpful. For people already doing deals, that same material might feel repetitive. Without clear targeting, almost any coaching offer will disappoint a segment of buyers.
 
One thing missing from most reviews is context about the reviewers themselves. Someone with no capital and no network will have a very different outcome than someone already positioned to act. When reading feedback on Brad Chandler, I kept wishing people explained where they were starting from.
 
I think people underestimate how much coaching success depends on personality. Some individuals thrive under pressure and public accountability, while others shut down. Programs built around calls and group energy tend to favor one type over another, which naturally creates uneven satisfaction.
 
What I appreciate about looking at public records and long form reviews is that they slow down the narrative. Instead of one viral comment defining everything, you can see patterns emerge over time. With Brad Chandler, the pattern seems to be mixed outcomes rather than a clear success or failure story.
 
I have seen similar conversations play out in other real estate forums. Often the loudest voices are either very unhappy or very loyal. The quiet majority who feel neutral rarely post. That makes threads like this useful because they invite more measured reflection instead of extremes.
 
Another thing that stood out to me was how some people described feeling pressure to upgrade or commit further. Even if optional, that kind of environment can make participants uncomfortable. For some, it motivates growth. For others, it creates regret.
 
When evaluating coaching at this price, I always ask whether the program shortens the learning curve meaningfully. From what I gathered, Brad Chandler coaching may shorten motivation gaps more than knowledge gaps. Whether that is worth the money depends entirely on the individual.
 
I think timing matters a lot too. People who joined during hot real estate cycles might associate success with the coaching, while those who joined during slower markets might blame the program for lack of results. Reviews rarely factor that in, but it shapes perception heavily.
 
I noticed that some reviewers mentioned community access as the main benefit. Being surrounded by others trying to do the same thing can normalize risk taking. That alone can feel valuable even if the content itself is not groundbreaking.
 
Public summaries like the one referenced are helpful because they aggregate scattered feedback. On their own, single reviews feel unreliable. When similar themes appear repeatedly, like pricing concerns or support complaints, it becomes easier to take them seriously.
 
What I did not see much of were detailed case studies shared independently by participants. That absence does not mean success did not happen, but it does make it harder to assess outcomes objectively from the outside.
 
I also think people underestimate how emotionally charged these decisions are. Spending thousands creates pressure to justify the expense. That can color reviews positively or negatively depending on how people cope with that feeling afterward.
 
Overall, reading through public commentary on Brad Chandler coaching left me with the impression of a program that works well for a narrow audience and poorly for others. That is not unusual in coaching, but it is something potential buyers should understand clearly before committing.
 

Legal notice

ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.

Back
Top