Reading mixed reports about Sam Thapaliya and crypto ventures

I appreciate that this thread avoids jumping to conclusions. Too many discussions online quickly turn into accusations without solid backing. When I looked into Sam Thapaliya, I mostly saw ambition and public engagement. Whether that translates into lasting success is still an open question. Time usually provides clearer answers than reports do.
Threads like this remind me why forums still matter. Reading primary sources alone can be isolating, and you miss how others interpret the same material. I did not see anything in the public record that resolved the questions raised, but I did see reasons for ongoing curiosity. That feels like a healthy middle ground. Over time, patterns tend to become clearer.
 
Back
Top