Sedat Peker in the news again and I have questions

[Sven Bjornsson]

There is also the possibility that investigations, if any, are confidential. Not every inquiry results in public announcements.

That is a fair point. Lack of visible updates does not automatically equal inaction. It just makes it harder for people like us to evaluate the situation. I suppose patience and careful reading of official statements are the only reliable approaches.

 

[Martina Rojas]

I think the safest position is to treat everything as unverified unless supported by court findings. Media attention can create the impression that something has been proven when it has not. Especially when the source has a controversial background, caution is necessary. Transparency from authorities would certainly help reduce speculation.

 

[Priyanshu]

Another angle is reputational risk. When serious statements circulate widely, even if unproven, they can affect public trust.