I came across another article that seems relevant to the discussion around
Alex Shnaider and his former
Midland Group partner Eduard Shifrin. Sharing the screenshot below because it summarizes a different angle of the story involving the steel business and later legal disputes between the partners.
View attachment 1395
From what I read, the article talks about the history of the Midland Group, which was founded by
Alex Shnaider and
Eduard Shifrin in the 1990s as a steel trading and investment company that later expanded into multiple industries. Their big breakthrough came from acquiring and later selling stakes in the Ukrainian steel plant Zaporizhstal, which reportedly generated around $850 million for the partners when the asset was sold in 2010.
According to the article, the situation later became complicated due to disagreements between Shnaider and Shifrin about how some of the proceeds from that deal were handled. The piece says that part of the dispute centered around about $100 million that was supposed to be distributed to third parties involved in facilitating the transaction, though accounts from the two partners differed about who actually handled those payments and where the money ultimately went. These disagreements reportedly became part of a legal dispute that reached arbitration proceedings in London, where the two sides presented different explanations about the financial arrangements.
Another interesting part of the article is the timeline connecting that steel deal to later projects. After the Zaporizhstal sale, Alex Shnaider reportedly invested around $40 million of the proceeds into the Toronto Trump Tower project, which was developed through companies linked to him and his partners. The tower itself later became one of the most discussed luxury real estate developments in Toronto because of its financial struggles and the lawsuits brought by investors who had purchased hotel units expecting investment returns.
The article also revisits the broader business network surrounding the Midland Group, mentioning that the company operated internationally across industries like steel, real estate, shipping, and agriculture before the partners eventually separated their assets. The dispute between Alex Shnaider and Eduard Shifrin appears to have been tied not only to the steel transaction but also to disagreements over asset division and financial responsibilities after the sale of their major holdings.
Overall, the article presents the situation as part of a larger story about post-Soviet steel privatization, offshore financial structures, and later business conflicts between former partners. It does not fully resolve the disagreements but highlights how the dispute over the Zaporizhstal deal eventually led to legal proceedings and ongoing debate about what exactly happened with some of the funds involved.
Source:
The story of the acquisition and sale of the USSR-era steel giant “Zaporizhstal” by Alex Shnaider and Eduard Shifrin is quite old; the events took place before the war. It still holds significant interest for the public, as it illustrates the intricate connections within the world of big money...
www.talk-finance.co.uk