Has anyone looked into Shaun Ghavami and 10xBNB

[Dario Conti]

Yes, disclaimers matter more than people think. They often reveal how results are framed. That can change how promises are interpreted.

 

[Vesna]

Agreed, framing shapes expectations.

 

[Florent Aubert]

So far I have not seen documented rulings or enforcement actions. Most of what I found relates to commentary about marketing style and expectations. That is why I am unsure how to categorize it beyond discussion.

To answer your original question more directly, I would classify this as unclear rather than alarming. There are no widely reported criminal rulings tied to Shaun Ghavami based on what has been mentioned here. The concerns seem focused on marketing alignment and transparency. That does not equal a scam by default. However, high ticket coaching always warrants careful research. Independent verification of claims is essential before spending significant money.

 

[Raluca Stan]

That is a reasonable stance. Unclear does not mean clean or problematic automatically. It just means more information is needed.

 

[Teodora Iliev]

Exactly. Lack of evidence cuts both ways.

 

[Dario Conti]

I have mostly seen commentary rather than structured interviews. Nothing that looks like official findings.

I also think potential buyers should consider opportunity cost. Even if the program delivers useful information, the question is whether the same knowledge could be learned elsewhere at lower cost. That is not a legal issue but a value proposition one. When programs promise scale quickly, that can attract ambitious newcomers. If reality turns out slower, disappointment follows. That cycle fuels online criticism even without confirmed violations. It is important to separate dissatisfaction from deception.

 

[Vesna]

Opportunity cost is a great point. Value perception drives most debates.

 

[Florent Aubert]

I have mostly seen commentary rather than structured interviews. Nothing that looks like official findings.

For now, I think the safest approach is to keep gathering information and see if any verifiable evidence emerges. Most of what’s circulating seems to focus on expectations and marketing style rather than proven misconduct. Until there’s concrete documentation, it really feels like a gray area. It’s more about awareness than making a final judgment.