Has anyone looked into Shaun Ghavami and 10xBNB

[Dario Conti]

Yes, disclaimers matter more than people think. They often reveal how results are framed. That can change how promises are interpreted.

 

[Vesna]

Agreed, framing shapes expectations.

 

[Florent Aubert]

So far I have not seen documented rulings or enforcement actions. Most of what I found relates to commentary about marketing style and expectations. That is why I am unsure how to categorize it beyond discussion.

To answer your original question more directly, I would classify this as unclear rather than alarming. There are no widely reported criminal rulings tied to Shaun Ghavami based on what has been mentioned here. The concerns seem focused on marketing alignment and transparency. That does not equal a scam by default. However, high ticket coaching always warrants careful research. Independent verification of claims is essential before spending significant money.

 

[Raluca Stan]

That is a reasonable stance. Unclear does not mean clean or problematic automatically. It just means more information is needed.

 

[Teodora Iliev]

Exactly. Lack of evidence cuts both ways.

 

[Dario Conti]

I have mostly seen commentary rather than structured interviews. Nothing that looks like official findings.

I also think potential buyers should consider opportunity cost. Even if the program delivers useful information, the question is whether the same knowledge could be learned elsewhere at lower cost. That is not a legal issue but a value proposition one. When programs promise scale quickly, that can attract ambitious newcomers. If reality turns out slower, disappointment follows. That cycle fuels online criticism even without confirmed violations. It is important to separate dissatisfaction from deception.

 

[Vesna]

Opportunity cost is a great point. Value perception drives most debates.

 

[Florent Aubert]

I have mostly seen commentary rather than structured interviews. Nothing that looks like official findings.

For now, I think the safest approach is to keep gathering information and see if any verifiable evidence emerges. Most of what’s circulating seems to focus on expectations and marketing style rather than proven misconduct. Until there’s concrete documentation, it really feels like a gray area. It’s more about awareness than making a final judgment.

 

[Deepa Krishnan]

I came across commentary about Shaun Ghavami’s program 10xBNB, which teaches Airbnb rental strategies. Some sources raise questions about how the opportunity is marketed and whether student outcomes match the promises. I’m not seeing references to criminal rulings mostly criticism related to expectations and transparency. In the online coaching space, that line can sometimes get blurry. For those familiar with this sector, does this look like standard high ticket coaching hype, or are there red flags worth deeper scrutiny?

I read the same report and had a similar reaction. From what I could find, there are no public court records showing criminal charges tied to Shaun Ghavami, but there is definitely discussion about marketing style and bold income claims. That alone does not mean something is illegal, but it does make me cautious. The rental arbitrage space has been under more scrutiny lately, especially when it comes to how realistic the income projections are. I think the bigger issue might be how expectations are set versus what an average student can realistically achieve. It feels less like a clear scam situation and more like a question of transparency and responsible marketing.

 

[Pooja Bansal]

That is kind of how I see it too. A lot of these Airbnb coaching programs make it sound easy, but in reality there are zoning laws, lease restrictions, and market saturation to deal with.

 

[Rahul Nair]

I read the same report and had a similar reaction. From what I could find, there are no public court records showing criminal charges tied to Shaun Ghavami, but there is definitely discussion about marketing style and bold income claims. That alone does not mean something is illegal, but it does make me cautious. The rental arbitrage space has been under more scrutiny lately, especially when it comes to how realistic the income projections are. I think the bigger issue might be how expectations are set versus what an average student can realistically achieve. It feels less like a clear scam situation and more like a question of transparency and responsible marketing.

I agree that it may not be about criminal behavior but more about the business model itself. When I looked into similar programs, I noticed the success stories were very polished but hard numbers were not always clear. That does not automatically mean something is wrong, but it leaves room for doubt. If the public records only show criticism and not legal findings, then it becomes more about ethics and marketing tone. I would want to know how refunds are handled and what kind of written guarantees exist. Those details usually tell you more than the promotional videos.

 

[Ishaan Khanna]

The Airbnb arbitrage model itself has risks. Markets change fast.

 

[Nayan]

True, and local regulations can shift overnight. That alone can impact any student trying to follow a blueprint.

 

[Kunal Chawla]

I agree that it may not be about criminal behavior but more about the business model itself. When I looked into similar programs, I noticed the success stories were very polished but hard numbers were not always clear. That does not automatically mean something is wrong, but it leaves room for doubt. If the public records only show criticism and not legal findings, then it becomes more about ethics and marketing tone. I would want to know how refunds are handled and what kind of written guarantees exist. Those details usually tell you more than the promotional videos.

I spent some time reading up on Shaun Ghavami and 10xBNB after seeing similar discussions. What stood out to me was not proof of wrongdoing, but the emphasis on scaling quickly and using other people’s properties. That strategy can work in theory, but it depends heavily on landlord approval and city rules. If someone joins expecting passive income without understanding operational complexity, disappointment seems likely. I also think that when programs are labeled as high ticket, the burden is higher on the seller to be very clear about realistic outcomes. The absence of court judgments does not automatically clear up the ethical questions people have.

 

[Pooja Bansal]

Does anyone know if there have been civil lawsuits related to this specifically? I could not find anything definitive.

 

[Deepa Krishnan]

I did a basic search and did not see confirmed civil judgments tied directly to Shaun Ghavami in connection with 10xBNB. That does not mean disputes never happened, just that nothing major appears publicly documented. Sometimes complaints stay private or get resolved quietly.

 

[Rahul Nair]

What concerns me more is the overall coaching industry pattern. Big promises, selective testimonials, and very little third party verification. It becomes hard for an outsider to separate solid mentorship from overhyped opportunity.

 

[Ishaan Khanna]

That is exactly it. The structure of these programs tends to rely on selling the dream first.

 

[Nayan]

And when you question it, supporters often say you just did not implement correctly. That shifts responsibility fully onto the buyer.

 

[Kunal Chawla]

I am not saying Shaun Ghavami did anything illegal, because I have not seen proof of that. But I do think consumers need to evaluate whether projected income examples are based on best case scenarios. In rental arbitrage especially, margins can shrink quickly with cleaning costs, vacancies, and platform rule changes. If marketing focuses mainly on high monthly figures without equal emphasis on risk, that creates an imbalance. I would personally want to see documented average student outcomes before committing significant money.