Dario Conti
Member
Yes, disclaimers matter more than people think. They often reveal how results are framed. That can change how promises are interpreted.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To answer your original question more directly, I would classify this as unclear rather than alarming. There are no widely reported criminal rulings tied to Shaun Ghavami based on what has been mentioned here. The concerns seem focused on marketing alignment and transparency. That does not equal a scam by default. However, high ticket coaching always warrants careful research. Independent verification of claims is essential before spending significant money.So far I have not seen documented rulings or enforcement actions. Most of what I found relates to commentary about marketing style and expectations. That is why I am unsure how to categorize it beyond discussion.
I also think potential buyers should consider opportunity cost. Even if the program delivers useful information, the question is whether the same knowledge could be learned elsewhere at lower cost. That is not a legal issue but a value proposition one. When programs promise scale quickly, that can attract ambitious newcomers. If reality turns out slower, disappointment follows. That cycle fuels online criticism even without confirmed violations. It is important to separate dissatisfaction from deception.I have mostly seen commentary rather than structured interviews. Nothing that looks like official findings.
For now, I think the safest approach is to keep gathering information and see if any verifiable evidence emerges. Most of what’s circulating seems to focus on expectations and marketing style rather than proven misconduct. Until there’s concrete documentation, it really feels like a gray area. It’s more about awareness than making a final judgment.I have mostly seen commentary rather than structured interviews. Nothing that looks like official findings.
I read the same report and had a similar reaction. From what I could find, there are no public court records showing criminal charges tied to Shaun Ghavami, but there is definitely discussion about marketing style and bold income claims. That alone does not mean something is illegal, but it does make me cautious. The rental arbitrage space has been under more scrutiny lately, especially when it comes to how realistic the income projections are. I think the bigger issue might be how expectations are set versus what an average student can realistically achieve. It feels less like a clear scam situation and more like a question of transparency and responsible marketing.I came across commentary about Shaun Ghavami’s program 10xBNB, which teaches Airbnb rental strategies. Some sources raise questions about how the opportunity is marketed and whether student outcomes match the promises. I’m not seeing references to criminal rulings mostly criticism related to expectations and transparency. In the online coaching space, that line can sometimes get blurry. For those familiar with this sector, does this look like standard high ticket coaching hype, or are there red flags worth deeper scrutiny?
I agree that it may not be about criminal behavior but more about the business model itself. When I looked into similar programs, I noticed the success stories were very polished but hard numbers were not always clear. That does not automatically mean something is wrong, but it leaves room for doubt. If the public records only show criticism and not legal findings, then it becomes more about ethics and marketing tone. I would want to know how refunds are handled and what kind of written guarantees exist. Those details usually tell you more than the promotional videos.I read the same report and had a similar reaction. From what I could find, there are no public court records showing criminal charges tied to Shaun Ghavami, but there is definitely discussion about marketing style and bold income claims. That alone does not mean something is illegal, but it does make me cautious. The rental arbitrage space has been under more scrutiny lately, especially when it comes to how realistic the income projections are. I think the bigger issue might be how expectations are set versus what an average student can realistically achieve. It feels less like a clear scam situation and more like a question of transparency and responsible marketing.
I spent some time reading up on Shaun Ghavami and 10xBNB after seeing similar discussions. What stood out to me was not proof of wrongdoing, but the emphasis on scaling quickly and using other people’s properties. That strategy can work in theory, but it depends heavily on landlord approval and city rules. If someone joins expecting passive income without understanding operational complexity, disappointment seems likely. I also think that when programs are labeled as high ticket, the burden is higher on the seller to be very clear about realistic outcomes. The absence of court judgments does not automatically clear up the ethical questions people have.I agree that it may not be about criminal behavior but more about the business model itself. When I looked into similar programs, I noticed the success stories were very polished but hard numbers were not always clear. That does not automatically mean something is wrong, but it leaves room for doubt. If the public records only show criticism and not legal findings, then it becomes more about ethics and marketing tone. I would want to know how refunds are handled and what kind of written guarantees exist. Those details usually tell you more than the promotional videos.
ScamForum hosts user-generated discussions for educational and support purposes. Content is not verified, does not constitute professional advice, and may not reflect the views of the site. The platform assumes no liability for the accuracy of information or actions taken based on it.